Nitej Davda
Partner
A partner in the real estate team, I specialise in all aspects of property dispute resolution as well as contentious construction matters. The varied nature of what I do means that every day poses different challenges so life is never boring.
When faced with problems I always try to put myself in my clients’ shoes and also those of any other parties to identify what is important to each side. That helps to identify solutions that work in legal terms and where necessary helps to maintain commercial relationships.
A client who was embarking on a career in the legal profession said: “As your client the quality and service I have experienced has been an inspiration”…and I didn’t have to pay him!
Expertise
Property disputes
Landlord and tenant disputes
Construction disputes
Leasehold reform
Insolvency (property)
Property based professional negligence
Qualifications & memberships
Property Litigation AssociationSociety of Construction Law
Recent articles:
- Section 233B Insolvency Act 1986 – What does it mean for construction contracts?
- Section 233B Insolvency Act 1986 - what does it mean for construction contracts?
- Update on External Wall Fire Review (Form EWS1)
- External walls and the new EWS1
- No oral modifications - worth the paper they're written on?
- Availability of liquidated damages - an update from the Court of Appeal
- SCL Kent Construction Seminar - 5 February 2019
- When an agreement is not an agreement
- Adjudication: What happens if a party is unhappy with the adjudicator’s decision?
- Overvaluation of dilapidated properties: what should damages amount to?
- Insolvency and adjudication
- Adjudication: Conduct of the parties and extensions of time
- Contractor insolvency: a checklist
- Shaping the Future
- The interaction between adjudication and insolvency
- Adjudication update
- Service of notices: a reminder
- Fixed Costs Pilot Scheme for Construction Disputes
- Almshouse occupants: tenants or beneficiaries?
- Construction Notices: Substance over form
- Relief for licensees
- Clarification on the requirement to consult
- The art of quiet enjoyment
- Consider Your Experts
- The Perils of Introducing Expert Evidence Without Permission
- Expert Evidence: The importance of getting it right
- Expert Evidence: The importance of getting it right
- Changes to Section 21 Notices
- The Havoc of Easements
- Cripps Pemberton Greenish Construction Seminar 2015
- A recent decision by The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
- A question of priorities
- Complying with payment provisions
- Construction Matters is on holiday
- Adjudication: Temporarily binding or conclusively binding?
- Fixed end trials: The future in the TCC?
- Eurocom revisited
- Construction Matters is taking an Easter break
- Adjudication: Getting the drafting right
- Business rates and the Budget
- Contract or no Contract?
- A plague on both your houses
- Costs: An update
- Happy New Year from the Construction Team at Cripps Pemberton Greenish
- Jurisdiction of the adjudicator
- It’s not always good to talk: welcome clarification on the consultation process needed before landlords can recover the cost of their qualifying works from their tenants
- Collateral Warranties vs NHBC
- Costs – an important reminder
- Welcome to Construction Matters
- Mortgagees and Costs: A warning
- Reliance on the Aarhus Convention in nuisance claims?
- Assessing rent on a lease renewal
- Take Notice
- Keeping guarantors in the loop: an update
- The effect of bankruptcy on the ability to enfranchise
- Dream house, tax nightmare
- Terminal Dilapidations Claims: A Useful Reminder
- Collateral warranties and adjudication
- Break notices: a win for tenant
- Extension of legal advice privilege
- Law Commission Report: The Electronic Communications Code
- Orme v Lyon - Doctrine of Lost Modern Grant
- Something in the Air?
- Court of Appeal defends common sense and common courtesy in finding against landlord
- Highway robbery
- Sustainable construction: SKA Rating